Map Size
Sun, 11/15/2009 - 00:56 — maho
(Note, original author of this poll was Kryon)
I think the current map size (20 thousand tiles) is too big. Even in LTXVI which started with 30 players the map has huge empty lands even at turn 60. I suggest we reduce map size for 30 player games and make it proportional with the # of players for smaller games.
This vote is for the map size for 30 player games and the map size for smaller games will be calculated as such:
What size of map you want? (N is number of players)
- (N/30)*20 (53.8%)
- (N/30)*16
- 20
- 28 (write-in)
- (N/30)*28 (write-in)
- (N/30)*12
- 16
- 24 (write-in), (N/30)*24: (write-in), 12
Total voters: 14
Comments
The first comment
I like the big map. But accept that it should be proportional to the number of players.
I think this vote is a bit confusing though. It would be easier to get a clear result by splitting it into two polls.
1. What map size do we play. (multiple choice)
2. Shall we make the map proportional to the number of players. (Y/N)
If you think that it should
If you think that it should be proportional, then choose proportional option.
I think that constant size is ok, then I have choosen constant option.
What is confusing here?
but from other side - I
but from other side - I prefer proportional 20 than constant 12 ... it would be impossible to express such preference in 2 separate polls.
revised
Mr original vote was proportional only. The choices were constant values for 30 player games and I had mentioned "for smaller games the map size will be (N/30)*X, X being the result of this vote". But maho changed it and added N and constant values to the choices. Now we have both constant and proportional options but I don't think we need constant options.
let people decide if they
let people decide if they want constant option. I want :).